医学伦理研究助手
前沿
论文精读

论文 · 队列研究

氯胺酮在临床与非临床环境中的真实世界治疗使用:一项横断面调查

J Psychoactive Drugs · 2026年9月23日 · Syed 等 9 位作者

问这篇
一分钟了解要点调查显示临床与非临床使用氯胺酮者均报告高疗效,但非临床使用幻觉风险更高。结果但非临床使用者报告长期幻觉的比值比更高(OR=2.58)。

不需要生物学背景,多打比方

正在获取全文并生成讲解(拿不到全文就依据摘要)…

已等待 0 秒大约需要 10–20 秒

可以先看别的,做好了会自动出现在这里。

这篇还没有动画

动画会把研究的流程、作用机制和关键结果一步一步演示出来,每一步都标明出自原文哪里。制作大约需要一两分钟。

目前只拿到了摘要全文暂时拿不到(可能不是免费全文)。下面是论文摘要。

摘要Abstract

摘要第 1 段问这一段

The use of ketamine as a treatment for mood disorders continues to grow in popularity. However, the differences between individuals consuming ketamine within clinical settings and those self-medicating in casual, non-clinical settings has not been yet characterized. Using the 2023 Global Psychedelic Survey, this study aimed to examine the demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the self-reported effectiveness and hallucination-related side effects, of ketamine use by comparing individuals using ketamine with and without medical supervision. Compared to clinical ketamine consumers (n = 238), non-clinical consumers (n = 222) were more experienced in use of various psychedelic (p < .0001) and non-psychedelic recreational substances (p < .001), and lifetime use of ketamine (p < .0001). Both groups presented with similar mild depression and anxiety symptoms at the time of the survey collection (p = .22, p = .46). Ketamine was similarly and highly rated in effectiveness within both groups when rated on a scale of 0-100 (83.3 ± 15.0 clinical, 81.2 ± 16.6 non-clinical; p = .45). Non-clinical consumers presented higher odds of reporting long-term hallucinations following ketamine use (OR = 2.58, 95% CI: 1.08-6.31). The results of this study indicate a high self-reported effectiveness of ketamine in clinical and non-clinical settings while emphasizing the potential risks of side effects when used without medical supervision.

这篇对您:
讲解或动画有问题: