医学伦理研究助手
前沿
论文精读

论文 · 综述

AI/ML时代的精准噬菌体治疗:从发现到临床转化证据的系统综述

Front Microbiol · 2026年9月9日 · Alharbi

问这篇
一分钟了解要点系统综述128项研究显示,AI辅助噬菌体治疗仍以计算工具开发为主,临床转化成熟度低。结果其中89.8%为方法/工具开发,78.9%仅做计算机模拟验证;管线覆盖不均,最集中于宿主范围和相互作用模块;整体转化成熟度低(中位AI_PTRL 6),81.2%存在高偏倚风险,68.8%有开发方法学问题,实验验证和真实世界部署有限。

不需要生物学背景,多打比方

正在获取全文并生成讲解(拿不到全文就依据摘要)…

已等待 0 秒大约需要 10–20 秒

可以先看别的,做好了会自动出现在这里。

这篇还没有动画

动画会把研究的流程、作用机制和关键结果一步一步演示出来,每一步都标明出自原文哪里。制作大约需要一两分钟。

目前只拿到了摘要全文暂时拿不到(可能不是免费全文)。下面是论文摘要。

摘要Abstract

摘要第 1 段问这一段

In precision phage therapy, artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) is being applied for phage detection, genomes/proteome annotation, host prediction, resistance profiling and therapeutic optimization. Yet the landscape remains fragmented owing to a lack of systematic synthesis of its translational maturity, methodological robustness and pipeline coverage. We performed a systematic review of AI/ML tools relevant to precision phage therapy. Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus and IEEE Xplore were used to identify records. Of 6,969 identified records, 2,214 duplicates were removed, leaving 4,755 unique records for title/abstract screening; 510 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 128 studies were included in the final synthesis. Studies were classified across a nine-module precision phage therapy pipeline by architectural family, validation maturity, accessibility, translational readiness (AI_PTRL), and methodological quality using an adapted PROBAST framework. The 128 included studies were published between 2012 and 2025, with a median publication year of 2023 and peak activity during 2022-2025. The large majority were methodological/tool development studies (115/128, 89.8%) and these predominantly described in silico validation (101/128, 78.9%). The pipeline coverage was uneven, with the highest concentration in the host range and interaction determinants (M4, 43/128, 33.6%) and genome/protein annotation and functional inference (M3, 33/128, 25.8%). Safety screening, therapeutic design, and infrastructure modules were comparatively underrepresented. From an architectural standpoint, hybrid/integrated systems (HIS) (39/128, 30.5%) and classical machine learning (CML) (38/128, 29.7%) were the most common approaches with substantial diversification after 2022. The overall translational readiness was modest (median AI_PTRL: 6, IQR 4-6). Methodological assessment demonstrated high evaluation risk of bias (104/128, 81.2%) and substantial development concern (88/128, 68.8%), especially in Domain 4 (analysis). AI/ML for precision phage therapy is a rapidly growing and diversifying field, particularly in host-phage interaction prediction, however efforts are still limited for downstream precise phage therapy tasks. Experimental validation and real-world deployment remain limited with methodological limitations due to analytical design and evaluative approaches. Future work should prioritize rigorous validation frameworks, higher-quality and more complete representative datasets, stronger safety screening, therapeutic optimization, and clinically actionable decision support.

这篇对您:
讲解或动画有问题: