论文 · 综述
AI/ML时代的精准噬菌体治疗:从发现到临床转化证据的系统综述
Precision phage therapy in the AI/ML era: a systematic review of discovery-to-clinical translation evidence
作者:Najwa Menwer Alharbi
Front Microbiol · 2026年9月9日 · Alharbi
不需要生物学背景,多打比方
正在获取全文并生成讲解(拿不到全文就依据摘要)…
已等待 0 秒大约需要 10–20 秒
可以先看别的,做好了会自动出现在这里。
这篇还没有动画
动画会把研究的流程、作用机制和关键结果一步一步演示出来,每一步都标明出自原文哪里。制作大约需要一两分钟。
摘要Abstract
In precision phage therapy, artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) is being applied for phage detection, genomes/proteome annotation, host prediction, resistance profiling and therapeutic optimization. Yet the landscape remains fragmented owing to a lack of systematic synthesis of its translational maturity, methodological robustness and pipeline coverage. We performed a systematic review of AI/ML tools relevant to precision phage therapy. Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus and IEEE Xplore were used to identify records. Of 6,969 identified records, 2,214 duplicates were removed, leaving 4,755 unique records for title/abstract screening; 510 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 128 studies were included in the final synthesis. Studies were classified across a nine-module precision phage therapy pipeline by architectural family, validation maturity, accessibility, translational readiness (AI_PTRL), and methodological quality using an adapted PROBAST framework. The 128 included studies were published between 2012 and 2025, with a median publication year of 2023 and peak activity during 2022-2025. The large majority were methodological/tool development studies (115/128, 89.8%) and these predominantly described in silico validation (101/128, 78.9%). The pipeline coverage was uneven, with the highest concentration in the host range and interaction determinants (M4, 43/128, 33.6%) and genome/protein annotation and functional inference (M3, 33/128, 25.8%). Safety screening, therapeutic design, and infrastructure modules were comparatively underrepresented. From an architectural standpoint, hybrid/integrated systems (HIS) (39/128, 30.5%) and classical machine learning (CML) (38/128, 29.7%) were the most common approaches with substantial diversification after 2022. The overall translational readiness was modest (median AI_PTRL: 6, IQR 4-6). Methodological assessment demonstrated high evaluation risk of bias (104/128, 81.2%) and substantial development concern (88/128, 68.8%), especially in Domain 4 (analysis). AI/ML for precision phage therapy is a rapidly growing and diversifying field, particularly in host-phage interaction prediction, however efforts are still limited for downstream precise phage therapy tasks. Experimental validation and real-world deployment remain limited with methodological limitations due to analytical design and evaluative approaches. Future work should prioritize rigorous validation frameworks, higher-quality and more complete representative datasets, stronger safety screening, therapeutic optimization, and clinically actionable decision support.
还没有查过关联研究
我会去找这篇研究之前的基础工作、做类似事情的研究,以及之后引用它的研究,并说明每篇为什么相关。