医学伦理研究助手
前沿
论文精读

论文 · 队列研究

生成式人工智能及相关技术在临床护理教育中的应用:临床带教老师实践与观点的质性描述研究

Nurse Educ Today · 2026年9月21日 · Kra-Friedman 等 4 位作者

问这篇
一分钟了解要点访谈 13 名临床护理带教老师,了解他们对生成式人工智能的看法、顾虑与学习需求。

不需要生物学背景,多打比方

正在获取全文并生成讲解(拿不到全文就依据摘要)…

已等待 0 秒大约需要 10–20 秒

可以先看别的,做好了会自动出现在这里。

这篇还没有动画

动画会把研究的流程、作用机制和关键结果一步一步演示出来,每一步都标明出自原文哪里。制作大约需要一两分钟。

目前只拿到了摘要全文暂时拿不到(可能不是免费全文)。下面是论文摘要。

摘要Abstract

摘要第 1 段问这一段

BACKGROUND: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly shaping nursing education. Although many studies have examined AI use among nursing faculty and students, little is known about how clinical preceptors, who supervise students in practice settings, understand, perceive, and use these tools. As students and academic faculty increasingly integrate AI into teaching and learning, preceptors may not be adopting AI at the same pace or in the same ways, potentially creating inconsistencies between academic and clinical learning environments.

摘要第 2 段问这一段

AIM: To explore the shared professional beliefs, values, and practices that shape nursing preceptors' engagement with AI across personal, educational, research, and clinical settings, and their implications for alignment between academic and clinical nursing education.

摘要第 3 段问这一段

DESIGN AND METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study explored the perceptions, experiences, and concerns of 13 clinical nursing preceptors regarding AI in personal, educational, research, and clinical contexts. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

摘要第 4 段问这一段

RESULTS: Four themes emerged: maintaining professional integrity in the presence of AI, barriers to AI use marked by fear, uncertainty, and cultural constraints, a desire to learn through structured guidance and safe exposure, and imagining AI as a catalyst for innovation, efficiency, and enhanced care. Participants viewed AI as a useful support tool but not a replacement for clinical judgment, relational care, or professional responsibility. Ethical concerns centered on reliability, privacy, authenticity, and potential erosion of critical thinking. At the same time, preceptors expressed interest in learning how to use AI safely and effectively, provided that institutions offer training, policy guidance, and ongoing support.

摘要第 5 段问这一段

CONCLUSION: By focusing on preceptors as a distinct group, this study highlights how academia could bridge the important gap between students' and preceptors' use of AI in clinical nursing education. These findings highlight the need for preceptor-specific AI literacy initiatives and organizational frameworks that promote ethical, informed, and context-sensitive integration of AI into clinical nursing education.

这篇对您:
讲解或动画有问题: