论文 · 病例对照
从口内X线片识别牙种植体的AI系统:诊断准确性研究
Artificial intelligence system for identifying dental implants from intraoral radiographs: A diagnostic accuracy study
作者:Ana Cases-Sánchez, Eva González-Angulo, Alexandra Flesariu-Onu, Carla Fons-Badal, Lucía Fernández-Estevan
J Prosthet Dent · 2026年9月24日 · Ana Cases-Sánchez 等 5 位作者
不需要生物学背景,多打比方
正在获取全文并生成讲解(拿不到全文就依据摘要)…
已等待 0 秒大约需要 10–20 秒
可以先看别的,做好了会自动出现在这里。
这篇还没有动画
动画会把研究的流程、作用机制和关键结果一步一步演示出来,每一步都标明出自原文哪里。制作大约需要一两分钟。
摘要Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Identifying an implant system from radiographic images is essential for managing prosthetic complications but often relies on a clinician's subjective assessment and incomplete patient records. The increasing number of implant systems worldwide complicates accurate recognition and delays treatment procedures.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a commercially available artificial intelligence software program in identifying different dental implant models from periapical radiographs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational retrospective study was conducted using 720 anonymized periapical radiographs representing 12 implant systems. Each radiograph was uploaded into the MovumStudio implant identification module, and a response was considered correct when the software program identified the implant brand or model as the first option with ≥70% confidence. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed to assess accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, the Cohen kappa coefficient, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (α=.05).
RESULTS: The artificial intelligence system correctly identified 589 of 674 valid intraoral radiographs, achieving an overall accuracy of 87.4% (95% confidence interval, 84.9% to 89.9%) and a Cohen kappa value of 0.864, indicating almost perfect agreement. Sensitivity and specificity were ≥90% for most implant systems, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve above 0.90, except for the GMI Frontier system (area under the curve=0.55). The mean response time was 8.42 ±5.96 seconds.
CONCLUSIONS: The MovumStudio implant identification module demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and reliability for recognizing most implant systems from periapical radiographs, offering a rapid, user-independent tool to support clinical decision-making.
还没有查过关联研究
我会去找这篇研究之前的基础工作、做类似事情的研究,以及之后引用它的研究,并说明每篇为什么相关。