论文 · 随机对照试验
达雷妥尤单抗联合硼替佐米、来那度胺和地塞米松治疗新诊断多发性骨髓瘤:CEPHEUS试验不适合移植亚组分析
Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Transplant-Ineligible Subgroup Analysis of CEPHEUS
作者:Saad Z Usmani, Thierry Facon, Vania Hungria, Nizar J Bahlis, Christopher P Venner, Marc Braunstein, Ludek Pour, Josep M Marti, Supratik Basu, Yael C Cohen, Morio Matsumoto, Kenshi Suzuki 等 30 人
J Clin Oncol · 2026年9月25日 · Usmani 等 30 位作者
不需要生物学背景,多打比方
正在获取全文并生成讲解(拿不到全文就依据摘要),大约需要 30–60 秒…
已等待 0 秒
这篇还没有动画
动画会把研究的流程、作用机制和关键结果一步一步演示出来,每一步都标明出自原文哪里。制作大约需要 30–60 秒。
摘要Abstract
The phase III CEPHEUS trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03652064) of patients with transplant-ineligible (TIE) or transplant-deferred newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM; N = 395) demonstrated improved overall minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rates among patients achieving ≥complete response and progression-free survival (PFS) with daratumumab plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (DVRd) versus VRd. We present efficacy and safety outcomes in the CEPHEUS TIE subgroup (N = 289; DVRd, n = 144; VRd, n = 145). Patients were either age 18-70 years with ≥1 comorbidity likely to negatively affect tolerability of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation or age ≥70 years. At a median follow-up of 58.7 months, the MRD negativity rate (10^-5) was 60.4% (DVRd) versus 39.3% (VRd; P = .0004). Rates of sustained MRD negativity (10^-5) for ≥12 months (47.2% v 28.3%; P = .0010) and ≥24 months (40.3% v 22.8%; P = .0015) were significantly higher with DVRd. Risk of disease progression or death was 49% lower for DVRd versus VRd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.74]; P = .0003). Although immature, overall survival favored DVRd (HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.42 to 1.03]). Adverse events were consistent with known safety profiles. This analysis demonstrates that the deep responses achieved with DVRd translate into improved PFS in patients with TIE NDMM, reinforcing DVRd as a standard of care.
还没有查过关联研究
我会去找这篇研究之前的基础工作、做类似事情的研究,以及之后引用它的研究,并说明每篇为什么相关。